Contact, if you are interested in this website / domain name / Sponsorship / Advertisement / Partnership →
Free labVirtual chips onlyMonte Carlo

Roulette & Betting-System Simulator

Pick a wheel, a bet and a betting system. Then run a thousand sessions in a second and see what really happens to the money — not what the system promised.

Simulation settings

—Sessions ending ahead
—Sessions busted
—Average result / session
—Observed edge (theory)

Bankroll paths — first 25 sessions

Dashed gold line = starting bankroll. Sharp cliffs are what a doubling system looks like when a losing streak arrives.

Distribution of session results

Spin once

0

Each spin is independent. The wheel has no memory.

The math in one table

BetPaysP(win) EUEdge EU / US
Single number35:12.70%2.70% / 5.26%
Split17:15.41%2.70% / 5.26%
Street11:18.11%2.70% / 5.26%
Corner8:110.81%2.70% / 5.26%
Six line5:116.22%2.70% / 5.26%
Dozen / column2:132.43%2.70% / 5.26%
Red / black, odd / even1:148.65%2.70% / 5.26%

On American wheels the five-number bet (0-00-1-2-3) carries a 7.89% edge.

What this simulator proves

Betting systems change the shape of your results, never their average. Martingale turns a steady small loss into many small wins and a rare, catastrophic loss. Paroli does the reverse. Over enough spins every system converges on the same thing: total amount wagered × house edge.

Expected loss = total wagered × house edge Martingale example (European red, $10 base, 7 straight losses = $1,270): P(7 losses in a row) = (19/37)^7 ≈ 0.94% → EV per series ≈ 0.9906 × $10 − 0.0094 × $1,270 ≈ −$2.05

Run Martingale with a $500 bankroll and look at the “sessions ending ahead” number: it is high. Then look at the average result: it is negative. That gap is the whole trick. Read the full breakdown in The Martingale System: Why Doubling Up Fails and Betting Systems Tested.

Reality check: no sequence of bets on a negative-expectation game can produce a positive expectation. The simulator uses virtual money so you can learn this for free.